"The Momentum-Maker Mastermind: Mindset, Methods, & Metrics"
Join Kirk on April 12th @9:45 AM (Pacific Time)
Our Services
We offer the most competitive rates and excellent service beyond closing. Guaranteed! PRO.
We offer guidance to real estate professionals, tax professionals, lawyers, and CPA's.
Are you ready to grow your business to
the next level and beyond. Kirk has helped hundreds of businesses and
can help you get there faster.
Our proven track record in solid investments has help hundreds and could help you too. Ask us how!
Kirk is the past President of the Universal City/North Hollywood Chamber of Commerce as well as a former co-chair of the ALFN Commercial Practices Committee. He is active as a speaker and moderator of several trade organizations including the CA Mortgage Bankers Association (CMBA), Mortgage Banking Association (MBA), and the Attorney Legal Financial Network (ALFN). Mr. Jaffe is quoted or has been a guest of several media outlets including: KABC790 Talk Radio, NBC and the Los Angeles Daily News to name a few.
Let Us Know What You Need!
MORTGAGE LENDING
We offer Custom Tailored mortgages for Home or Business!
BUSINESS CONSULTING
Grow your business FAST with our Business Consulting Services!
INVESTMENT CONSULTING - REAL ESTATE ASSETS
Our win/win approach to investing has helped hundreds. FIND OUT MORE!
REAL ESTATE PROFESSIONALS
If you are a real estate professional and are ready to work with a partner with years of experience, you're in the right place.
CPAS, ATTORNEYS, AND INSURANCE PROFESSIONALS
If you have questions about the potential legal implications of real estate transactions for your clients, Kirk Jaffe has the answers!
“What a GREAT guy Kirk is! I highly recommend him and his services all the time and for my own home loan needs. Why would I say that as a Broker myself? Well as a Buyer and a Broker I cannot have my hand into many aspects of the transaction, so I trust Kirk with my financing needs he has yet to let me down! "
"Kirk is my go-to lender. He has worked many “miracle situations” and provides top notch service from start to finish...."
"I have known Kirk Jaffe for many years. Kirk has a stellar reputation. You can see his reviews by going to www.mycity.com/profile/kirk-jaffe."
"When I need any information regarding the Real Estate Financing space for a client, my first call is to Kirk Jaffe. He is knowledgeable, professional, and experienced. He stays on top of cases and follows up with clients. He is a true asset to my business."
"Kirk works hard and well day and night, a kind person and gets it done fast!"
"Kirk did a fabulous job. He walked me thru the process and it was incredibly easy compared to other mortgages I've done. Thanks to Kirk, my house closed in under 21 days, and he got me a great interest rate."
An L.A. County judge dismissed a lawsuit challenging L.A.’s “mansion tax” on Tuesday, marking the end of a months-long legal challenge from the luxury real estate community that looked to declare the measure unconstitutional.
The transfer tax known as Measure ULA was passed in November and took effect April 1, bringing a 4% charge on all residential and commercial real estate sales in the city above $5 million and a 5.5% charge on sales above $10 million, pumping millions into housing and homelessness-prevention efforts.
Los Angeles County Superior Court Judge Barbara Scheper issued a tentative ruling dismissing the challenge on Monday after hearing arguments from both sides, and she officially dismissed the lawsuit on Tuesday, according to court documents.
The ruling is a big win for housing activists, who say that L.A. desperately needs the money raised by the tax.
“This is a great day for Los Angeles,” said Joe Donlin, who serves as director of the United to House LA coalition, which brought the measure onto the ballot in November. “The judge’s ruling confirms what we knew all along: ULA is the law of the land and it’s the will of the people. And it reminds us of the power of the people to shape our city’s future for the good.”
Donlin said he was surprised the ruling came out so soon.
“Before the hearing, we thought it might take weeks or months, but this was a positive sign that the judge didn’t feel compelled by the plaintiff’s arguments,” he said.
Greg Bonett, senior staff attorney for the Public Counsel who worked to defend the measure, applauded the decision, calling it “a resounding victory for the power of the people to initiate transformative solutions to address our city’s housing and homelessness crises.”
The judge’s ruling is a blow for many in the luxury real estate community, who claim that the transfer tax has frozen the market and stifled development.
Keith Fromm, an attorney for Newcastle Courtyards, one of two groups challenging the measure, said he plans to appeal the decision.
“The order contains numerous errors of law which the appellate courts will hopefully recognize and correct,” Fromm said. “The ruling is simply one step in a very long journey to justice.”
The legal battle — which was headed by two main groups: Newcastle and Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Assn. — became a national conversation, as other cities looked to L.A. to see how it would implement such a tax.
Other cities such as San Francisco, New York City and Culver City have implemented transfer taxes, but L.A.’s is unique in scope and scale, not just taxing home sales but all property sales above $5 million.
Voters approved the measure with a 57% majority in November, and the tax became a hot-button issue immediately after.
Advocates argue that the tax is a way for luxury property owners to contribute to solving L.A.’s housing crisis, while opponents say it discourages development and pushes owners out of L.A. and into cities that don’t have the tax, such as Beverly Hills, West Hollywood or Santa Monica.
“With Measure ULA, we are now going to lose billions of dollars every year in economic development and property tax revenue in order to raise less than $500 million through the tax,” said Jason Oppenheim, a real estate agent with the Oppenheim Group and star of Netflix’s “Selling Sunset.”
The luxury real estate market froze in the months after the measure took effect, as many luxury homeowners looked to find loopholes to avoid paying the tax. Many hired accountants to find workarounds, such as dividing their homes into three parcels and selling them separately to stay under the $5-million threshold at which the tax kicks in.
Many homeowners held off on selling their homes, hoping the lawsuit would overturn the tax. As a result, funds raised by the tax have fallen dramatically short of original projections since sales have slowed.
In November, proponents of the tax estimated it would raise roughly $900 million a year. In March, a report from the city administrative officer lowered that number to $672 million. Then in April, Mayor Karen Bass’s first budget proposal, a $13.1-billion plan, included only $150 million in projected revenue from Measure ULA.
The number was chosen out of caution, as the city wanted to funnel as much money as possible toward housing and homelessness issues but not so much that it wouldn’t be able to pay it back if the measure were ruled unconstitutional.
But with the court’s latest ruling, spending will likely increase.
On Wednesday, the L.A. City Council’s budget, finance and innovation Committee will meet to discuss the implementation process, and the ULA coalition will propose that $12 million be reallocated to short-term emergency assistance for renters.
In August, the City Council passed a $150-million spending plan for funds raised by Measure ULA. It was the first time funds were specifically allocated since the tax was passed in November, and the plan sent money to six programs: short-term emergency rental assistance, eviction defense, tenant outreach and education, direct cash assistance for low-income seniors and people with disabilities, tenant protections and affordable housing production.
© LOS ANGELES TIMES
Need to reach us? Send us an email or give us a call today.
Kirk Jaffe Enterprises, Inc.
195 Highway 50, Ste 104-476
Stateline, NV 89449